Partenaires

CNRS
Logo tutelle
Logo tutelle
Logo tutelle


Rechercher

Sur ce site

Sur le Web du CNRS


Accueil du site > Atomes, cavités et photons > Principes de l’electrodynamique quantique en cavité > Spin et oscillateur : états habillés

Spin et oscillateur : états habillés

The coupled atom-field system is conveniently described in terms of the dressed states. We use them to investigate the quantum Rabi oscillation at resonance and the dispersive shifts in the non-resonant case.

The Jaynes-Cummings hamiltonian

The complete atom-cavity hamiltonian writes :


H=H_a+H'_c+H_{ac}\ ,

where H_a and H'_c are the atom and cavity hamiltonians. The coupling term, H_{ac}, is -D\cdot E_c, where E_c the electric field operator at the atomic location. The hamiltonian H has been introduced by Jaynes and Cummings as an approximation to matter-field coupling in free space. It is only in a cavity that it provides a precise description of the atomic dynamics, since the interaction with a single mode dominates the evolution.

We assume first that the atom is sitting at cavity centre [|f(r)|=1]. The coupling hamiltonian is then :


H_{ac}=-d\left[\epsilon_a \sigma_-+\epsilon_a^*\sigma_+  \right]\cdot iE_0\left[\epsilon_c a-\epsilon_c^* a^\dagger   \right]\ ,

where \epsilon_c is the unit vector describing the field polarization at cavity centre. Its expansion involves four terms. Two are proportional to \sigma_-a and \sigma_+a^\dagger. The first corresponds to a transition from e to g, together with the annihilation of a photon. The second describes the emission of a photon by an atom in a transition from g to e. When the cavity and atomic transition frequencies, \omega_c and \omega_{eg}, are comparable, these terms correspond to non-resonant processes. They can be neglected (Rotating Wave Approximation). The two others, proportional to \sigma_+ a and \sigma_-a^\dagger, correspond to photon absorption or emission and the atom-cavity coupling reduces to :


H_{ac}=-i\hbar\frac{\Omega_0}{2}\left[ a\sigma_+-a^\dagger\sigma_- \right]\ ,

where we introduce the `single photon Rabi frequency’, \Omega_0 :


\Omega_0=2\frac{dE_0\epsilon_a^*\cdot\epsilon_c}{\hbar}\ .

We assumed that \epsilon_a^*\cdot\epsilon_c is real and positive, hence \Omega_0. The frequency \Omega_0 measures the strength of the atom-field coupling. It is proportional to the interaction energy of the atomic dipole with a classical field corresponding to a single photon stored in C. In our experiments \Omega_0=2\pi\times50 kHz, a rather large value. It is much larger than the cavity relaxation rate, achieving the `strong coupling regime’ of cavity QED.

The `uncoupled states’, eigenstates of H_a+H'_c, are the tensor products |{e,n}\rangle and |{g,n}\rangle of atomic energy eigenstates and cavity Fock states, with the energies \hbar(\omega_{eg}/2+n\omega_c) and \hbar(-\omega_{eg}/2+n\omega_c). The ground state of H_a+H'_c is the non-degenerate |{g,0}\rangle state. When the atom-cavity detuning, \Delta_c=\omeg-\omega_c, is much smaller than the atomic frequency, the uncoupled states |{e,n}\rangle and |{g,n+1}\rangle are degenerate (\Delta_c=0) or nearly degenerate. They form a ladder of equally-spaced two-level manifolds, which are not coupled by H_{ac}. The diagonalization of the full hamiltonian amounts to solving separate two-level problems.

Dressed states

We consider here the restriction H_n of the Jaynes and Cummings hamiltonian to the manifold spanned by |{e,n}\rangle and |{g,n+1}\rangle. Taking the energy reference at the mid-point between these levels, H_n writes in matrix form :


H_n=\frac{\hbar}{2} \left(\begin{array}{cc}
\Delta_c&-i\Omega_n\\i\Omega_n&-\Delta_c\end{array}\right)\ ,

where


\Omega_n=\Omega_0\sqrt{n+1}\ .

The Rabi frequency \Omega_n is proportional to \sqrt{n+1}, relative field amplitude in the n-photons Fock state.

The eigenvalues of H_n are :


E_n^\pm=\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}\sqrt{\Delta_c^2+\Omega_n^2}\ ,

and the eigenvectors, the `dressed states’ :


|{\pm,n}\rangle=\cos\theta_n^\pm|{e,n}\rangle+i\sin\theta_n^\pm|{g,n+1}\rangle\ ,

are generally entangled atom-cavity states. The mixing angles \theta_n^\pm are given by


\tan\theta_n^\pm=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\Delta_c^2+\Omega_n^2}\mp\Delta_c}{\Omega_n}\ .

The positions of the dressed energies are represented as a function of \Delta_c on the figure above. For large detunings, the dressed energies almost coincide with the uncoupled ones \pm\hbar\Delta_c/2. At zero detuning, the uncoupled levels cross. The atom-cavity coupling transforms this crossing into an avoided crossing, the minimum distance between the dressed states being \hbar\Omega_n. We examine now two limiting cases : the resonant case (\Delta_c=0) and the detuned case (\Delta_c\gg\Omega_0).

Resonant coupling

In the resonant case, the mixing angles are \theta_n^\pm=\pm\pi/4 and :


|{\pm,n}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[|{e,n}\rangle\pm i|{g,n+1}\rangle \right]\ .

The separation of the dressed states at resonance, \hbar\Omega_n, corresponds to the frequency of the atom-field reversible energy exchange. We consider an atom in state e at time t=0 inside the cavity containing n photons. The initial state, |{\Psi_e(0)}\rangle=|{e,n}\rangle, expands on the dressed states basis as :


|{\Psi_e(0)}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}\left[|{+,n}\rangle+|{-,n}\rangle  \right]\ ,

and becomes at time t :


|{\Psi_e(t)}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}\left[ |{+,n}\rangle e^{-i\Omega_n t/2}+|{-,n}\rangle e^{i\Omega_n t/2}  \right]\ .

The probabilities for finding the atom in e or g are obtained by returning to the uncoupled basis :


|{\Psi_e(t)}\rangle=\cos\frac{\Omega_n t}{2}|{e,n}\rangle+\sin\frac{\Omega_n t}{2}|{g,n+1}\rangle\ .

The coupling results in a reversible exchange between |{e,n}\rangle and |{g,n+1}\rangle at frequency \Omega_n. This is the Rabi oscillation phenomenon. It can be understood as a `quantum beat’ between the two dressed states. For the initial state |{e,0}\rangle (or |{g,1}\rangle), this oscillation occurs at the frequency \Omega_z.

Non-resonant atom/cavity coupling

We give here a perturbative treatment valid for large atom-cavity detunings. We assume \Delta_c > 0, with \theta_n \ll 1. We develop the eigenstates and eigenenergies in powers of \Omega_n /\Delc. To first order for states and to second order for energies :


\left| { + ,n} \right\rangle  \approx \left| {e,n} \right\rangle  + \frac{{\Omega_0 \sqrt {n + 1} }}{{2\Delta_c }}\left| {g,n + 1} \right\rangle


\left| { - ,n} \right\rangle  \approx  - \left| {g,n + 1} \right\rangle  + \frac{{\Omega_0 \sqrt {n + 1} }}{{2\Delta_c}}\left| {e,n} \right\rangle


\frac{1}{\hbar }E_{ + ,n}  = n \omega_c  + \frac{{\omega_{eg} }}{2} + \frac{{\Omega_0 ^2 (n + 1)}}{{4\Delta_c }}


\frac{1}{\hbar }E_{ - ,n}  = (n+1) \omega_c - \frac{{\omega_{eg} }}{2} - \frac{{\Omega_0 ^2 (n + 1)}}{{4\Delta_c }}\ .

The dressed states |+,n\rangle and |-,n\rangle are very close to the uncoupled states, which are slightly `contaminated’ by the atom-field coupling. The energies of these levels are shifted to second order by an amount proportional to n+1, combination of a light shift, proportional to n, and of a Lamb shift effect.

Assume now that we couple an atom in level e with a coherent field |\alpha \rangle and let the two systems interact for a time t. Expanding the coherent state on a Fock state basis and taking into account that |e,n \rangle is very close to the | +,n\rangle dressed state, we get :


\left| {\Psi _{e,\alpha } (0)} \right\rangle  = \left| e \right\rangle \left| \alpha  \right\rangle  = \sum\limits_n {c_n \left| {e,n} \right\rangle }  \rightarrow


\left| {\Psi _{e,\alpha } (t)} \right\rangle \approx \sum\limits_n {c_n e^{ - in \omega_c t} e^{ - i\omega_{eg} t /2} e^{ - i\Omega_0 ^2 (n + 1)t/4\Delta_c } \left| {e,n} \right\rangle } \ ,

which, in interaction picture yields :


\left| {\widetilde \Psi _{e,\alpha } (t)} \right\rangle  \approx \sum\limits_n {c_n \;e^{ - i\Omega_0^2 (n + 1)t/4\Delta_c } \left| {e,n} \right\rangle } \quad  = e^{ - i\Omega_0 ^2 t/4\Delta_c } \left| e \right\rangle  \otimes \left| \alpha e^{ - i\Omega_0 ^2 t/4\Delta_c}  \right\rangle \ .

Similarly, for an atom initially in level \g we obtain :


\left| {\widetilde \Psi _{g,\alpha } (t)} \right\rangle  \approx \sum\limits_n {_n e^{ + i\Omega_0^2 nt/4\Delta_c} \left| {g,n} \right\rangle } \quad  = \left| g \right\rangle  \otimes \left| \alpha e^{ + i\Omega_0 ^2t/4\Delta_c} \right\rangle \ .

The cavity is in a coherent state, phase shifted by an angle \pm \Phi_0 = \pm \Omega_0^2t/4\Delta_c depending upon the atomic state. This effect is interpreted by attributing to the atom an index N_i=1\pm\Omega_0^2/4\Delc\omc, with the + and - signs corresponding respectively to an atom in \e or \g. With the parameters of our experiment we find, for \Delc = 3\Omega, |N_i-1|\approx 10^{-7}, a huge value for a single atom effect. Note that this index is linear for extremely low fields only and saturates for average photon numbers of the order of (\delta/\Omz)^2, since the dispersive regime condition is no longer fulfilled. Note also the global quantum phase shift of the system’s state when the atom is in \e. This is a cavity Lamb shift effect.

Up to now, we have considered the atom as motionless at cavity center. In the actual experiment, the atom flies across the cavity mode waist w. The atom-field coupling, proportional to the relative mode amplitude f, is thus a time-dependent quantity. In the dispersive regime, the previous results still hold, when the time t is replaced by an effective interaction time t_i^d taking into account the integrated atom-field coupling. For a full crossing of the mode :


t_i^d=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{w}{v}\ .

Note that the same approach can be used in the resonant case, with a different effective interaction time t_i^r :


t_i^r=\sqrt{\pi}\frac{w}{v}\ .